We’re not watching TV these days.
If you think it’s because of the writers’ strike . . . you’re wrong. We detest most of their inane product and we shun it year-round.
There are a few exceptions, e.g. The Sopranos. (Of course, in a showdown with The Man, we naturally solidarize with the poor writers (Don’t see a triple entendre every day, do you?).)
Yup, that closing puntuation is correct. Poor Lynn Truss.
Our TV-starved diet, however, has a different driver: We moved recently, and we haven’t gotten around to hooking up the beast. This denial-of-service is of our own making.
We confess to a weakness, probably inherited, for a highball and a half-hour of network news. But when it comes to television, it turns out no news is good news.
You can spend 30 minutes with ABC World News Tonight, but for a far better return, spend it with the NYT or WSJ. To see why, compare a network newscast transcript to a serious newspaper. The half-hour TV “news” takes about 5 or 10 minutes to read.
The downside is missing out on some graphics and video, but you can find anything important online.
Here’s one more upside: the sudden and complete absence from your life of ABC’s Martha Raddatz, the Most Concerned Person on Earth.
In any case, Holly wired the tube to the DVD player. Had I tried it, there would have been bumps and profanity (which is usually weak language). But the Hollster made it look easy.
There’s trouble in DVD Land, by the way.
Anyway, we’ll climb back on the TV grid eventually. We’re not anti-medium. Plus we like a little Entertainment Tonight now and then (the most watched entertainment news show in the world!).
Still, we can’t help recalling a comment by Bob Keeshan, better known as Captain Kangaroo: “One of the big secrets of finding time is to not watch television.”